Sunday, August 16, 2026

Reading record 26.8

 Argh, I am so sick of those decimal places!  ðŸ¤¬

Uh.  Anyway.

Today's book was Theseus, Volume Three, by Jordan Holt.  A graphic novel I backed on Kickstarter.  Volume one was back in 2020, so it's been long enough since the previous volumes that I forgot many of the individual quirks of this telling of the Theseus myth.

Or rather I forgot the problematic one:  the author chose to include the "Medea subplot."

Which is a genuine part of some ancient tellings of the myth, but it sucks.  (The subplot, not this book.)  Basically, it makes Medea into Theseus' evil stepmother, and...yeah, actually, that's pretty much all that needs to be said.  Making Medea into a villain instead of a victim was emblematic of the misogyny and xenophobia that was so prevalent in ancient Greek society.

There's something extra demented about adding Medea to Theseus' tale in particular.  (Again, I am specifically here talking about whatever ancient Athenian chose to add her into the story.)  Because let's look at the facts:

1) Medea playing the evil stepmother comes hard on the heels of the conclusion of Theseus' brief affair with Ariadne, who he abandoned on Naxos at the orders of Dionysos.  (Surprisingly, the author of this modern book chose to leave that out, so Theseus actually ended up with Ariadne.)

2) Medea and Ariadne play the exact same role in their own stories:  they are both foreign princesses who betray their fathers in order to enable the Greek hero to achieve his goal successfully, rather than dying miserably as they would have done unaided.

3) Both Medea and Ariadne are thrown over by their dependent Greek beau as soon as they are no longer useful.  (Excuses were made in both cases, but they don't change the hard facts of the matter.  Especially since there are versions where Dionysos does not order Theseus to abandon Ariadne, and merely picks her up after Theseus has sailed off and left her.  (Those versions presumably came from somewhere other than Athens...))

4) Medea and Ariadne are actually first cousins!  Ariadne's mother, Pasiphae, is the sister of Aeetes, Medea's father.

5) (And this is the big one!) It's actually chronologically impossible for Medea to have been courting/marrying Aegeus during Theseus' youth.  This is why:  in his old age, the twice-widowed Theseus abducted an underage Helen of Sparta, planning to make her wife #3.  Her twin brothers, Castor and Polydeuces, rescued her while Theseus was held prisoner in the House of Hades for trying to help his bestie kidnap Persephone in an attempt to marry her.  Castor and Polydeuces went along on the voyage of the Argo to steal the Golden Fleece from Colchis.  (This event basically had to be after the abduction of Helen, since Castor and Polydeuces are the same age as Helen, and surely would have been viewed as too young to Argonauts before that time!)  Therefore, Theseus is already old and twice widowed by the time Medea leaves Colchis!

This is, of course, the big trouble in trying to work with Greek myths, because you have centuries of ancient texts (even setting aside Roman versions...which very few people do, as pretty much anyone you ask is likely to know Ovid's version of Medusa's 'origin story,' despite that his version is literally not attested anywhere prior to his Metamorphoses, strongly suggesting that he just effin' made it up), which were written drawing on different traditions from different regions, and which represent the different opinions and agendas of different authors, etc.  There is no hint of consistency even in the actual Greek versions, and as soon as you start looking at modern versions as well (to say nothing of Medieval and Renaissance versions!) it becomes even more wildly muddled.

Uh...

Yeah, I have completely lost track of anything else I may have wanted to say.

So.

Erm.

Well.

Guess that's the post, then.


Original language:  English

Saturday, August 15, 2026

Reading Record 26.5(ish)

 Today I finished reading Legend of Exorcism, volume 6, by Fei Tian Ye Xiang.  (Volume 5 was the first book for this reading record back in May.  That's how long they're making us wait in between volumes of this novel that has been finished for years!  ðŸ˜­ðŸ˜­ðŸ˜­  I don't want to have to wait that long for the remaining two parts!! 😭😭😭😭)

Um.

Anyway.

This time, the character guide at the end did start out by saying that some of the side characters are historical, but it only gave the Emperor, his consort and her cousin the chancellor as examples.  Not anyone else, not even the rebel general who's leading a massive army against the empire.  And it still hasn't mentioned that Di Renjie was real, either, though maybe they figure he's so famous that they don't have to?  (Or maybe they think no one cares...?  I have no clue what they're thinking.  How could I?)  It makes me long for the greater effort they put into the supplementary materials on their earlier releases, particularly the character guide for Thousand Autumns, which listed (historical) or (fictional) after every name.  I don't know if it was some kind of administrative decision or if whoever was writing the character guide for Thousand Autumns was just feeling more invested than whoever has handled subsequent character guides, but either way, it boils down to being frustrating.

In any case...it's volume 6 out of 8, so how much even can I day about it?

Well, except that I fear all too many of the extreme horrors of war being depicted in the novel are historically accurate.  (You know, outside the ones involving yaoguai and demons.  Those particular horrors I think one can feel safely assured are fictional.)

...

Hmm.

I should probably say more, but I don't know what.

Oh well.


Original language:  Chinese

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Reading record 25.5(ish)

 So, last night I finished Men at Arms by Terry Pratchett, the second of the City Watch sub-series of Discworld novels.

And I don't really have much to say?  Because, like, it's Discworld.  There's no need to say much more than that.  Solid works of fantasy-comedy, the whole series.  (Well, okay, I've heard there are a few outliers that aren't as good, but this isn't one of them.)

There was a bit at the end that I loved which (despite being at the end) I can share (possibly in paraphrase, because the book is in the other room so I can't check if the phrasing in my mind is the correct phrasing) because it's not actually connected to the plot.  After seeing something Carrot has written, Vimes reflects on some of the quirks of his writing style, namely his inability to put "i" before "e" and his "cruelty to the common comma" by putting commas in weird places where they absolutely don't belong.  I would call Carrot's abuse of commas "unique" (and it was probably intended to be unique) only if Carrot was truly the only one who ever used a comma that way, then much of the Internet is apparently Carrot.  ðŸ˜…

Anyway, rather than going straight on to book three, I'll be waiting until I can hit a bookstore today to pick up the new volume of Legend of Exorcism, because tomorrow I have a doctor's appointment, and a nice paperback is much easier to read in a waiting room than a massive, three novel hardback.  (Also, I like the idea of being the middle-aged woman proudly reading danmei in a public place.)  Plus the larger print is easier to read in the less ideal conditions of the waiting room environment.


Original language:  English

Saturday, August 8, 2026

Reading record 24.5(ish)?

 Okay, so this one didn't quite feel like it had enough meat on its bones to deserve a full number, which means who knows when/how I'll get back up to whole numbers again.  ðŸ˜…

Uh.  Anyway.  The book I just finished was Barbie:  The World Tour by Margot Robbie and Andrew Mukamal.  Which was much less an artbook about the movie Barbie than it was a photo journal of the tour for the premieres of the film, along with information and behind the scenes images about the outfits that Margot Robbie wore for the various public appearances as part of the tour.

Which is probably why whoever had bought it originally sold it to that used store, as they had most likely paid as little attention as I did in buying it.  ðŸ˜…  (But since I got it used, I paid a small enough amount for it that it felt like an appropriate price.)

But it was still an interesting read and had lots of pictures of vintage Barbie outfits and photos of Margot Robbie wearing outfits either recreating those vintage outfits or at least heavily inspired by them.  So it was still interesting, even if it wasn't quite what I thought it was.

In any case, like the movie, it was definitely something that a doll collector like myself got more out of than someone with no history with the dolls would.  (Though the movie stands better on its own than this book would, I think.  Although someone more interested in fashion than I am might like the book without needing an interest in dolls.  Probably?)

Um.

Anyhow.

It is late.  I need to start relaxing my brain or I won't be able to sleep.


Original language:  English

Friday, August 7, 2026

Reading record 23.7(ish)

 Just finished reading the next artbook in the stack, Strange & Eerie Cryptid Creatures by Jessica Feinberg and Daniel Faccio.

I've been supporting Jessica Feinberg's Kickstarters for I don't know how many years now--I have so many oracle decks with her art on them at this point!  Anyway, this was her most recent oracle deck/artbook combo.

The format of the book is pretty standard:  each painting gets an entry with various information about the depicted creature.  Which in this case was cryptids, though in some cases I felt like the chosen being was definitely on the other side of the fuzzy line between cryptid and folklore.  (Things like the barghest, cu-sith, and kappa, for example.)  Despite obvious effort to make it as worldwide as possible, certain regions were under-represented (Asia) and others over-represented (the US, especially West Virginia for some reason), but I think that's because that's just how it is:  there's no way for an artist to change what people all over the world are seeing and thinking they've seen, ya know?

Anyway, significantly more text (and more pages, for that matter!) than the previous artbook, but less than the next one. (I chose this particular decimal point number for it because in a few weeks the next volume of a printed web comic is being released, so that will round it back up to even numbers. 😅)


Original language:  English

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

IWSG - ack, I forgot!

 


    Argh, I forgot about today's post entirely!


😭😭😭😭😭


That sorta sums up my writing lately.

I've been distracted, forgetful, and unable to focus.

I think it's the heat.

The past three or four days, I've just opened my current project, read over bits of it to remind myself where I am...and then...nothing... 😭

I hope it's just the heat.

Tuesday, August 4, 2026

Reading record 23.2(ish)

 Maybe only 23.1?  There was almost no text whatsoever. 😭

Anyway, the book I finished reading (looking at?) just now was Legend of Mana - Art of Mana - 30th Anniversary SPECIAL ISSUE.  And yes, that whole thing is apparently the title.  What little text the book had was just image caption by Masaru Oyamada, the producer of the Seiken Densetsu series.

As an art book, it was actually more focused on the remaster/reissue of the game in 2021 than it was on the original release from 1999.  (The 30th Anniversary part must be for the series as a whole...which means at least three different major game series started in 1996, in addition to the two biggest JRPG series starting in...wait, really?  1986?  Dang, that's...I hadn't thought about just how early that really was.  (Though it took three years for the first Final Fantasy to be translated into English and released in the US.)  Back in 1986, I was still playing text-parser-driven adventure games like The Black Cauldron and the early King's Quest and Space Quest games...)  Wait, maybe the earlier book from 2018 was the thirtieth anniversary and that's why this was a "special issue"...?  'Cause there's no way both 2 and 3 would have been on the Super Famicom if the first one came out in 1996--the Playstation had already been out for at least year by 1996!

I really loved Legend of Mana back on the PS1, but I've never had the nerve to pick up the new version; I know it got a mew translation, and I'm afraid they wimped out and changed all the elemental's names back to the mistranslations and shortened versions they had on the SNES version of Secret of Mana.  Which may sound like a dumb reason to avoid the remaster, but...it was really frustrating playing Trials of Mana and hearing the Japanese voice work saying the proper names and then seeing the butchered SNES versions written on the screen.  Especially since I know the real names better, having played Legend of Mana so many times!

Anyway, this art book was a little disappointing because it was mostly filling in gaps that had been left out of an earlier whole-series art book (of which I was unaware at the time and thus do not have) and focusing on the remastered art that hadn't been made yet during that earlier book.  Also, it has the dippy-looking male player character on the front instead of the awesome-looking female player character.  ðŸ˜­

Oh well.

An expensive chunk of brief nostalgia, I guess.

Original language:  Japanese