So, I finished reading something else today.
The something else in question being Lady Molly of Scotland Yard by Baroness Orczy. (The author of The Scarlet Pimpernel.)
It's a book of short stories, though, so I've been reading it on and off in between other books since, like, March, I think? (In book club, after we read The Seven Dials Mystery, we were all talking about how public domain mystery novels might make good choices to adapt into visual novels, so I went out looking for ones that I could see if I wanted to adapt them. And I thought a short story collection by a woman and featuring a female detective might be a good idea, but...)
In short, what I can say about this book is: avoid.
Excessive classism at every turn, combined with racism, internalized misogyny, and that bizarre phenomenon you encounter in some older works where perceived "national character" is treated with racism-like prejudice. (It might be called "pseudo-racism," perhaps? I've heard the term, but never been quite sure what it referred to, precisely.) Admittedly, I expected a certain amount of classism going in, what with the author being a baroness and all, but I hadn't expected it to be as egregious as it was: people of lower classes were invariably described as filthy, stupid, lazy or some combination of the three, sometimes presenting those characteristics as a purposeful repudiation of propriety.
On top of all that, in the final story, which I can only assume was being serialized slowly and the author failing to check back on what she had already written, the title character was being romantically pursued by her own half-brother. Neither she nor the narrator (her former maid and now best friend, who always described Lady Molly as "the woman I love best" and yet it was hard to interpret it as anything sapphic that might have salvaged the work), seemed to recall that this dude's mother was the same woman who was Lady Molly's mother. Made my skin crawl. Though the whole book did that already, of course.
All in all, it was like a full course on how not to write. (The mysteries weren't even very good! Lady Molly either jumped to conclusions based on intuition alone, or came to logical conclusions based on large amounts of information not presented to the reader. And in one case the police were literally incompetent: they failed to ask such basic information of the witnesses as the height and body type of the killer they had seen! Additionally, multiple cases were described as among the most "dastardly" ever seen, when the victim was merely poisoned or bludgeoned. It's like, "lady, have you forgotten about Jack the Ripper?" How can you call a simple murder "the most dastardly" when there was a guy who was slicing women to pieces in alleyways? (And these stories were written around 1901-1904, so it's not like there's any chronological excuse!))
Honestly, I think I only finished reading it because I kept hoping that it would get better. Only to have it get worse instead.
